It seems as they spoke too soon though, because band members Hillary Scott, Charles Kelly and David Haywood have now confirmed to E! News that they are suing White in order to keep their name after talks broke down. “Today we are sad to share that our sincere hope to join together with Anita White in unity and common purpose has ended,” they said in a statement. “She and her team have demanded a $10 million payment, so reluctantly we have come to the conclusion that we need to ask a court to affirm our right to continue to use the name Lady A, a trademark we have held for many years.”News that the country band is suing a Black blues singer over a name she's used for decades is not sitting well with many, who rightfully pointed out the lawsuit is another move born out of that band’s white privilege. Artist Lady A expressed the same criticism on Instagram after hearing about the suit shortly after it was announced on July 8. “You finally realize your name is racially problematic so you shorten it, but then sue the black woman that has been using that name for 2 decades,” she wrote on her Stories. “That’s some white privilege.” Detractors added that stealing from a Black woman is pretty reminiscent of the band's original name and pointed out the name-change seems more like a transparent attempt to look "woke" rather than a true move toward equality.View this post on Instagram
Let’s unpack this for a second. @ladya changes the antebellum in their name to ‘A’ to be on the right side of history and distance themselves from slavery. Then, proceeds to sue a black artist who has been using that same name for over 2 decades? Tight pic.twitter.com/SySuthLbFV
— Stevie Cantu (@booDONK) July 9, 2020
Lady Antebellum changing their name to Lady A to be “woke” with BLM only to SUE AN ACTUAL BLACK ARTIST who already has that name proves that the elite do NOT care about “equality” they care about feeling better about themselves while still making their money!
RT!— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) July 8, 2020
In its statement to E! News, band Lady A said they aren’t looking for monetary compensation and they don’t want to prevent Anita White from using the name Lady A. According to them, they’re trying to “freely and lawfully” use the name. “When we learned that Ms. White had also been performing under the name Lady A, we had heartfelt discussions with her about how we can all come together and make something special and beautiful out of this moment," they said.[video_embed id='1977788']RELATED: Sasha Exeter, Jessica Mulroney and white privilege [/video_embed]"We never even entertained the idea that she shouldn't also be able to use the name Lady A, and never will—today's action doesn't change that. Instead, we shared our stories, listened to each other, prayed and spent hours on the phone and text writing a song about this experience together," the statement continued. The band added that they're "committed to educating ourselves" and "doing our part to fight for... racial justice."Aside from the Instagram story, White didn’t respond to E!’s request for comment, but she did speak out on the subject recently to Newsday. In mid-June she revealed that any announcements of a mutual understanding were premature, and that to her it signified broken trust. “I received a draft agreement from the Antebellum camp. I'm not happy about [it] yet again after talking in good faith,” she wrote in an email. “Their camp is trying to erase me and I'll have more to say tomorrow. Trust is important and I no longer trust them.”[video_embed id='1991428']BEFORE YOU GO: Breonna Taylor docuseries episode is on the way [/video_embed]Y’all changed your name to Lady A and sued a Black woman who has been using that name for 20 years @ladya? That made sense to y’all?
— first of all my business on Beyoncé site (@earringdealer) July 9, 2020